The Why and How of Wi-Fi Part 1

Ethernet – The Basics

Most computers today use Ethernet technology to connect to their respective networks. Wired or wireless, the characteristics are meant to function similarly.

Why Wireless?

In today’s industrial (and even nonindustrial) applications, running cables can be tedious and expensive. One too-tight staple in a run of cable can greatly diminish the speed or even render it virtually useless causing you to bring in specialized technical personnel. Cable also limits the placement of a device whereas wireless connectivity allows a device to be mobile and flexible in positioning as the needs demand. For example, if a truck scale has a driveway between it and the scale house, running an underground conduit can be expensive and time-consuming. In this situation, placing one antenna on top of the scale house and another one on a pole, next to the scale, can solve the problem easily.

In another situation, a long length of cable that is vastly unprotected from harsh elements would typically be a connection requirement between the scale house and a remote scoreboard. A wireless connection is able to solve this problem as it is an excellent candidate for connectivity anywhere there is a possibility of damaging a scale cable. In addition, remember that a home run cable can be damaged by excessive force such as vehicular traffic, but if the excitation lines are shorted in that process, the instrument can also be damaged, incurring a significant repair bill. Using a junction box and converting the home run cable to a wireless connection can alleviate that possibility. Always consider the entire cost of ownership of a system including repairs that may come up, rather than just the simple initial cost.

Range can also be an issue. Some wireless connections can operate over a few miles under the right conditions. These connections can help with remote access to data as well as remote printing in another location for auditing and tracking transactions as they occur.

Wi-Fi Standards

The wireless Ethernet standards were developed by the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers) and have the designation of 802.11x where x is one or two letters. These standards determine some of the communications protocols and the frequency used for transmission. The designations start with “a” and are currently up to 802.11ax, but here are the more common ones:

802.11a The original 802.11 release
802.11b The second release – uses the 2.4 GHz frequency for longer outdoor range
802.11g The next major release after b, with data rates up to 54Mbps
802.11n Uses either 2.4 or 5 GHz, higher bandwidth, higher speeds, up to four simultaneous data streams (MIMO)
802.11ac Uses only 5 GHz frequency but can use eight streams with 4X the bandwidth. This gives much higher speed and allows for multiple users simultaneously. Release 2 of this standard will support MU-MIMO

Environment

By obtaining a line of sight, meaning no obstructions between the transmitter and the receiver, you will gain optimum range and avoid possible interference. Obstructions can range from walls, buildings, trees, as well as other transmitters. To get the most range, look at the interference sources and select the frequency that has the least interference. Best results are achieved if you can arrange a system placing the antennas in a line of sight of each other. Keep in mind that even with an appropriate line of sight established, the published range can rapidly decrease due to environment and weather. In general, maximum range is approximately 150 feet indoors and 300 feet line of sight. In addition, multiple access points that are cabled to the switch or router can make a hotspot in a particular area that can be as much as 300 feet from the nearest wired switch.

Antenna Selection and Placement

In the event of a need to increase range through obstructions, a higher gain or beamforming antenna can be used. Some of these higher gain antennas simply provide a more focused beam in a particular direction instead of the circular antenna placement in a commonly used pole or omnidirectional one. See adjacent diagram.